Sovereignty and Declaration of Independence of the Republic of Moldova


  • Gorincioi Grigore University "1 Decembrie 1918" Alba-Iulia


Sovereignty, Romanians, Republic of Moldova, Independence, Soviet Union


The sovereignty, independence, and integrity of territory are the core values of the functioning and development of any state. These elements are directly linked with security assurance. The millenary history of Moldova people and its continuous statehood within the ethnic region of its national making makes it a sovereign and an independent state. The Republic of Moldova gains this popularity or independence after so many struggles; the struggle for language, parliament, and the social and economic rights of Moldova people. The Declaration of Independence Republic of Moldova instantly and clearly declares Moldovan sovereignty on top of the territory of Transnistria as this is a component of the historical and cultural region of the Republic of Moldova. Although, the Declaration of Moldova Independence is itself used as an altercation opposing Moldovan sovereignty over Transnistria. In order to build up the unitary concept, ‘Romanianism’ in Moldova became an ethnic nationalism, which became a warning for the existing state recognition; thus, the young started undermining the political positions that the country took in that period. The Republic of Moldova fights against Russia for political restraints. They fight for the predominance of private properties, economy, and market reforms. The will of the Republic of Moldova people would mean that they can decide their present and future, and in this regard, Romania supports the strengthening of its sovereignty. The basic notion of PF (Popular Front) understood the return of Soviet concepts as a political, slavish conformism, which is essentially the main reason for the economic and cultural doldrums.



How to Cite

Grigore, G. . (2020). Sovereignty and Declaration of Independence of the Republic of Moldova. SCIENTIA MORALITAS - International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research , 5(1), 153-168. Retrieved from